United States District Court, D. New Mexico
GREGORY E. KUCERA, Plaintiff,
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant.
ORDER IMPOSING ADDITIONAL FILING RESTRICTIONS AND TO
MATTER comes before the Court on Plaintiff's failure to
show cause why the Court should not impose additional filing
Court has previously imposed filing restrictions on Plaintiff
stating "Plaintiff also will be enjoined from initiating
further litigation in this Court unless either a licensed
attorney who is admitted to practice before this Court signs
the pleading or Plaintiff first obtains permission to proceed
pro se." Doc. 6 at 2, filed May 21, 2018,
Kucera v. Lawrence Livermore National Laboratories,
No. 1:18-cv-00250-WJ-LF (D.N.M.) (describing steps Plaintiff
must take to obtain permission to proceed pro se in
the second case that Plaintiff has filed after the Court
imposed filing restrictions. Plaintiff has not complied with
the filing restrictions in either case. See Doc. 5,
filed October 8, 2019, in Kucera v. Department of
Justice, No. 1:19-cv-00931-MV-JFR (D.N.M.) (reminding
Plaintiff that the Court had previously imposed filing
Court notified Plaintiff of proposed additional filing
restrictions and ordered Plaintiff to show cause, by November
22, 2019, why the Court should not impose the proposed
additional filing restrictions. See Doc. 7, filed
November 8, 2019.
subsequently paid the filing fee for this case and filed the
(i) "Motion to Pro Se and Motion to Compell [sic]
Emergency Release of Privacy Act and FOIA's for Judicial
Review," Doc.10, filed November 18, 2019.
(ii) "Motion for Emergency Hearing on Protective
Order/National Security Letter, Expedited Review on
FOIA/Privacy Act; Motion to E-File," Doc. 11, filed
November 22, 2019.
(iii) "Supplemental," Doc. 12, filed November 25,
(iv) "Motion for Appointment of Counsel, Motion for
Hearing for Motion to View In Camera, Ex-Parte, Current
Dossier," Doc. 13, filed November 26, 2019.
(v) "Motion for an Emergency Hearing, Motion Appointment
of Counsel, or Need to Know Motion to Pro Se and Motion to
Compell [sic] Emergency Release of Privacy Act and FOIA's
for Judicial Review," Doc. 14, filed November 26, 2019.
(vi) "Judicial Review 552(a)(4)(B), Expedite," Doc.
15, filed December 2, 2019.
(vii) "Judicial Review. 5 U.S.C. §
552(A)(6)(E)(III), and 5 U.S.C. § 552(A)(4)(B), Doc. 16,
(vii) "Motion for Summary Judgement [sic] Motion for
Plenary Withholdings Review and Appointment of Intermediary
for Multiple Agency Expedite/Mandatory Declassification
Review," Doc. 17, filed December 6, 2019.
these documents show cause why the Court should not impose
the proposed additional filing restrictions. The Court now
imposes the additional filing restrictions that Plaintiff may
not commence any civil actions without prepayment of fees and
the Clerk of the Court shall not ...