Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Fisher v. Robertson

United States District Court, D. New Mexico

January 4, 2019

COY E. FISHER, Plaintiff,
v.
JEFFERY L. ROBERTSON, ACCC GENERAL,[1] JOHN DOES I-X, and JANE DOES I-X, Defendants.

          SCHEDULING ORDER

          STEPHAN M. VIDMAR UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE.

         THIS MATTER is before the Court on a telephonic Rule 16 scheduling conference held on January 4, 2019. The parties' Joint Status Report and Provisional Discovery Plan [Doc. 21] is adopted, except as modified below. The Court will permit discovery as follows:

1. 30 Interrogatories by each party to any other party;
2. 30 Requests for Production by each party to any other party;
3. No limit on the number of Requests for Admission served by each party at this time;[2]
4. 10 depositions per side;
5. Depositions limited to 4 hours on the record unless extended by agreement of the parties, except depositions of parties and experts, which are limited to 7 hours on the record unless extended by agreement of the parties.

         In accordance with the Civil Justice Expense and Delay Reduction Plan adopted in compliance with the Civil Justice Reform Act, and pursuant to Title 28 U.S.C. § 473(a)(1), this case is assigned to a “complex” (210-day) track classification. The Court sets the following case management deadlines:

Plaintiff[3] moves to amend the pleadings or join additional parties by4:

February 15, 2019

Defendant moves to amend the pleadings or join by[4]:

March 1, 2019

Plaintiff discloses experts and provides expert reports or summary disclosures by[5]:

June 3, 2019

Defendant discloses experts and provides expert reports or summary disclosures by5:

July 3, 2019

Termination of discovery:

August 2, 2019

Motions relating to discovery filed by[6]:

August 22, 2019

Pretrial motions other than discovery motions filed by:

September 3, 2019

Proposed Pretrial Order due from Plaintiff to Defendant by:

October 18, 2019

Proposed Pretrial Order due from Defendant to Court by[7]:

November 1, 2019

         Discovery shall not be reopened, nor shall case management deadlines be modified, except by an order of the Court upon a showing of good cause. Discovery must be completed on or before the discovery deadline. Accordingly, service of written discovery is timely only if the responses are due prior to the discovery deadline. A notice to take deposition is timely only if the deposition takes place prior to the discovery deadline. The pendency of dispositive motions does not stay discovery.

         IT IS SO ORDERED.

---------

Notes:

[1] Apparently, this Defendant was improperly identified in the Complaint as “ACCC General”; the correct name is “ACCC Insurance ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.