Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

CalMat Co. v. OldCastle Precast, Inc.

United States District Court, D. New Mexico

March 28, 2017

CALMAT CO., Plaintiff,
v.
OLDCASTLE PRECAST, INC., KRAFT AMERICAS, L.P., a limited partnership, RUNE KRAFT, KRAFT AMERICAS HOLDINGS, INC., and JOHN DOES 1-5, Defendants.

          ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S PROPOSED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION

         This matter comes before the Court on:

1) the Magistrate Judge's Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition (“PFRD”) (Doc. 85);
2) Rune Kraft's “Notice to the Court About Document 12” (Doc. 93);
3) Rune Kraft's “Judicial Notice - Perjury and Subornation of Perjury is Conduct Subject to Imprisonment, Not an Award of Attorneys' Fees” (Doc. 94);
4) CalMat Co.'s Motion to Strike Documents 93 and 94 (Doc. 111);
5) Rune Kraft as Amici Curiae's “Response to Plaintiff CalMat Co.s [sic] Motion to Strike Notice to the Court About Document 12 and Judicial Notice - Perjury and Subornation of Perjury is Conduct Subject to Imprisonment, Not an Award of Attorneys' Fees” (Doc. 115);
6) CalMat Co.'s Reply (Doc. 117);
7) Rune Kraft's “Notice of Appearance” on behalf of Kraft Americas Holdings, Inc. (“KAHI”) (Doc. 119);
8) Rune Kraft's “Motion to Suspend the Court's Rules” on behalf of KAHI (Doc. 120);
9) Rune Kraft's “Motion to Deny CalMat Co.'s Request for Attorneys' Fees as Perjury and Subornation of Perjury is Conduct Subject to Imprisonment, Not an Award of Attorneys' Fees” on behalf of KAHI (Doc. 121);
10) Rune Kraft's “Judicial Notice - The Court's Records Do Not Reflect Kraft Americas Holdings, Inc.'s Legal Position” on behalf of KAHI (Doc. 122);
11) Rune Kraft's “Judicial Notice - CalMat Co., Waycor Materials' Alleged Successor is in Serious Breach of Contract and is Continuing to Act in Defiance of the Contract” on behalf of KAHI (Doc. 123);
12) Rune Kraft's “Motion to Enforce Specific Performance and Set Aside All Orders that Interfere with KAHI's Contractual Rights” on behalf of KAHI (Doc. 124); and
13) Rune Kraft's “Motion to Dismiss Based on Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(1) and/or Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(h)(3)” on ...

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.