Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Silva v. Board of County Commissioners For County of Roosevelt

United States District Court, D. New Mexico

January 31, 2017

TANYA SILVA, Plaintiff,
v.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS FOR THE COUNTY OF ROOSEVELT, ROOSEVELT COUNTY ADULT DETENTION CENTER, DAVID CASINOVA, DREW WHITE, CAMERON RIDENOUR, DIVINE ALCANZO, JANE-JOHN DOES 1-5, and JANE-JOHN DOES 6-10, Defendants.

          ORDER SETTING SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE

          STEPHAN M. VIDMAR United States Magistrate Judge

         THIS MATTER is before the Court pursuant to a telephonic status conference held on January 31, 2017. To facilitate a final disposition of this case, a mandatory Settlement Conference will be conducted in accordance with Rule 16(a)(5) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The conference will be held on March 20, 2017, at 9:00 a.m. in the Pecos Courtroom, Pete V. Domenici United States Courthouse at 333 Lomas Boulevard Northwest in Albuquerque, New Mexico.

         The parties or a designated representative, other than counsel of record, with full authority to resolve the case, must attend in person. Counsel who will try the case must also attend in person. Counsel are encouraged to read “Keys to a Successful Mediation” by Judge James A. Hall prior to the settlement conference.[1] Those attending the settlement conference must treat as confidential the information discussed, positions taken, and offers made by other participants in preparation for and during the conference.[2] See generally Hand v. Walnut Valley Sailing Club, No. 11-3228, 2012 WL 1111137 (10th Cir. Apr. 2, 2012) (unpublished) (affirming dismissal of case as sanction for violating confidentiality of settlement conference). Counsel shall advise their clients regarding appropriate attire for appearance in federal court.

         No later than March 1, 2017, Plaintiff[3] shall serve on Defendant a letter setting forth at least the following information: (a) a brief summary of the evidence and legal principles that Plaintiff assert will allow it to establish liability; (b) a brief explanation of why damages or other relief would be warranted; (c) an itemization of the principles supporting those damages; and (d) a settlement demand.

         No later than March 8, 2017, Defendant shall serve on Plaintiff a letter that sets forth at least the following information: (a) any points in Plaintiff's letter with which the defense agrees; (b) any points in Plaintiff's letter with which the defense disagrees, with references to supporting evidence and legal principles; and (c) a counteroffer.[4] If a release is contemplated, defense counsel shall include a proposed form of release with the letter.

         Each of these letters typically should be five pages or fewer, and counsel must ensure that each party reads the opposing party's letter before the Settlement Conference. If the case does not settle, Plaintiff shall provide copies of these letters to the Court no later than 5:00 p.m. on March 15, 2017. Otherwise, the letters will be kept confidential.

         It has been the Court's experience that disagreement over special damages-e.g., past medical expenses, lost wages, property damages-often presents an obstacle to settlement. Therefore, if Plaintiff is claiming special damages, Plaintiff's letter must itemize such special damages and state the exact dollar amount Plaintiff is claiming for each category. If Defendant disagrees with the amount of special damages listed in Plaintiff's letter, Defendant's letter must state the exact dollar amount Defendant believes to be correct for each category. In other words, if Plaintiff claims $1, 000 in past medical expenses, and Defendant believes the correct amount of past medical expenses is $500, Defendant's letter must clearly state that Plaintiff's past medical expenses amount to $500. It is insufficient simply to say, “Defendant disagrees that Plaintiff has $1, 000 in past medical expenses.” If there is a dispute over any item of special damages, counsel will be required to do two things. First, lead trial counsel for Plaintiff and lead trial counsel for Defendant must meet (in person or telephonically) prior to the settlement conference to try to resolve the dispute. Counsel are specifically instructed to talk to each other; an exchange of emails or correspondence is insufficient. Second, if the dispute cannot be resolved, lead trial counsel for Plaintiff and lead trial counsel for Defendant will each bring with them to the settlement conference all documentation supporting their position on special damages and will be prepared to personally argue their position. This duty cannot be delegated to an associate, a party representative, or an insurance representative. The Court will expect each lead trial counsel to be prepared to present his or her case on special damages.

         No later than 5:00 p.m. on March 15, 2017, each party must provide the Court, in confidence, a concise position statement (typically no more than ten pages) containing an analysis of the strengths and weaknesses of its case and the names of the individuals who will be attending the conference and in what capacity. Position statements must be submitted to the Court by e-mail at VidmarChambers@nmcourt.fed.us.[5]

         Furthermore, if any party has in its possession any video or audio recording of the incident upon which this action is based, that party must submit a copy of the recording to the Court no later than 5:00 p.m. on March 15, 2017.

         The Settlement Conference will not be vacated or rescheduled except upon motion and for good cause shown. Any motion to vacate or reschedule the Settlement Conference shall provide the Court with sufficient notice to ensure that other matters may be scheduled in the time allotted for the Settlement Conference.

         The Court may contact counsel ex parte prior to the Settlement Conference to discuss the Settlement Conference.

         IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED as follows:

         Plaintiff's letter and settlement demand due to ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.